Paper Argues AI Agents Represent New 'Agentic Software' Paradigm
This paper argues that AI agents—where LLMs serve as the primary reasoning engine, generating and discarding code at runtime rather than executing static pre-written logic—represent a fundamental restructuring of software itself, not just an incremental tool upgrade. The authors formalize a distinction between traditional deterministic software and 'agentic software,' trace a historical arc from licensed software to SaaS to 'Agent-as-a-Service,' and propose 'Agentic Engineering' as a new discipline centered on agent systems rather than static code, with humans shifting from code authors to 'intent architects.' Using benchmark evidence (SWE-bench Verified, EvoClaw, LangChain multi-agent studies), they outline both the paradigm's promise and current limitations, ending with a four-stage roadmap toward self-evolving agent ecosystems. Twitter discussion around the paper was sparse, mostly just sharing the link; one commenter noted that the paper's title was changed in its v2 revision (posted six days after v1), a minor observation hinting at possible reframing of the paper's claims or scope.
Discussion: 2 tweets from 2 authors · @thesupermanmx, @hdsh0428