Essay Argues for Total Ban on AI Use in Mathematics
This essay argues for total opposition to the use of artificial intelligence in mathematics, contending that AI's growing role poses a crisis for the discipline. The author offers concrete proposals for how mathematicians, departments, journals, and institutions could coordinate to resist AI adoption and preserve mathematics as a human practice. Notably, the abstract does not elaborate on the specific mechanisms of the claimed 'crisis,' framing the piece more as a manifesto than an empirical analysis. On Twitter, Steven Strogatz flagged the essay as a rare full-throated anti-AI stance in a field increasingly enthusiastic about AI tools, urging careful reading regardless of one's position. Amin Karbasi offered a skeptical counterpoint, comparing the situation to machine-made versus handmade Persian rugs — suggesting that just as machine rugs eventually dominated the market without erasing appreciation for handmade ones, AI-generated math may proliferate without necessarily destroying the value of human mathematical work.
Discussion: 2 tweets from 2 authors · @stevenstrogatz, @aminkarbasi